Analysis of the Effectiveness and Development Recommendations for “Double First-Class” Universities Based on the ESI Database

By comparing data from the ESI database in July 2021 and November 2015,this study analyzes the changes in discipline distribution and academic influence of "Double First-Class" universities.The research indicates that there are 19 "Double First-Class" universities with newly added ESI disciplines, totaling 456 disciplines, with growth rates of 11.32% and 61.54% respectively.Among the 137 "Double First-Class" universities, 118 have entered the ESI rankings, accounting for 86.13%.In terms of disciplines, engineering, chemistry, and materials science, which are traditionally strong disciplines, have shown a significant increase, with 110,84,and 81 universities respectively.In China, 179 disciplines have entered the top 1‰ globally, reaching the level of world-class disciplines, among which "Double First-Class" universities have 171 disciplines, accounting for 95.53%.Overall, the "Double First-Class" construction has achieved remarkable results, with great potential for disciplinary development.However, there are still issues such as uneven development, lack of top-notch disciplines, and low proportion of high-level achievements.Universities should recognize the meaning of ESI indicators, scientifically and reasonably formulate development plans, adopt development models that suit their own characteristics.The authorities should also take a holistic view, coordinating and guiding interdisciplinary cooperation and disciplinary layout among universities.